China's Opinions
Like I've always said here, if you want to know what is going on in America, read the foreign press. China has responded to
our publication of the human rights records of various countries by writing up their own view of our human rights record in 2001. It's interesting to see what was omitted, like the fact that there was no violence associated with the turmoil of our presidential election recount. Read it for yourself.
1911 Encyclopaedia Online
I worry about having resources that have been published in the last seven days, and now, I can use something that is 90 years old. What will they think of next?
Developing Blog Content
I found an article today that has helped me to find clarity around the issues I struggle with on this blog. I started this blog as an outlet for the amazing things I was finding in the press around the world, things I started reading compulsively after 11 September. I found my world had grown so large and had such a different perspective that I wanted to share it. I had been sending emails with links to friends, receiving positive comments. But I wanted something more substantial, something that I could return to myself, and rediscover parts of my own path of discovery. I wanted a bread crumb trail of my own readings and thoughts.
So, I started Trivium about two months ago. The traffic has been low, and I've wondered at times why I'm bothering to do this at all. It seems that I am really the one enjoying it most, and that is enough reason to keep doing it. But I've struggled to redefine what I do, to focus the blog in a clearer way, so that I also have a sense of satisfaction from being read. The truth is -- if I stop writing this stuff down here, I'll still be reading the news every day. Reading mostly from my own bookmarks to news sites, with only a handful of blogs being read. So maybe I'll develop another blog with a clearer focus, but I suspect I'll keep this one, also.
This article today really helped me to understand the roles of disseminating information. I want to be both a maven and a connector, and while that may be possible, my heart is really into being the maven first. Maybe I can learn how to be both.
Journalists Replaced By Computers?
Yes, it is true. But really, the type of writing these computers are doing is more like the arithmetic tasks that computers have taken away from accountants. Journalists are still needed to interview, prioritize, and write substantial articles. If computers can take away the boring writing tasks, like summarizing news releases, then I'm all in favor of it. (Can I find a computer that can take over some of my repetitive and boring writing tasks?)